Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dale Deardorff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 19:41, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dale Deardorff

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No visible notability. Everything here is self-published. WorldCat shows only his MA and doctoral theses. prod removed, with the reaso" Dr. Dale S. Deardorff's work is in innovation research is recognized as a vital citation for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HBDI ". The actual reference there is to his doctoral thesis, and it documents the word "others" (other applications of HBDI, unspecified) . I tried to clean up the article but discovered there would be nothing left if I did so. DGG ( talk ) 02:58, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — —Darkwind (talk) 03:22, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable subject. Attending conferences does not make one notable. Bella the Ball (talk) 05:11, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Created by SPAs with no third party references. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:42, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing in the article hints at any kind of notability, academic or otherwise. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nothing at all leaps out as meeting any of the criteria in WP:ACADEMIC.--BlueonGray (talk) 18:53, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.