Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dakota Junction, Minnesota

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:35, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dakota Junction, Minnesota

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another railroad junction topo GMaps magically turned into a community by mass-production. Reywas92^Talk 02:00, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Reywas92^Talk 02:00, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Reywas92^Talk 02:00, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm not sure how this got to be listed as a populated place, but in looking at maps of Pennington County, I don't see much of a populated place here. There's no grouping of homes or businesses or anything to suggest this is a community -- just a railroad junction. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 02:55, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GEOLAND#2 Lightburst (talk) 22:54, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Railroad junction does not meet GNG. –dlthewave ☎ 01:14, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There was, at least, a foreman's house there, where people lived (well, specifically, Mrs. Carl Stromberg), back in the 1920s. Not sure exactly what we'd want to do with it. See: [1] [2], [3] [4] SportingFlyer T·C 03:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.