Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daivajna surnames and Gotras
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:04, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Daivajna surnames and Gotras (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No Citations are found. I propose for deletion of this. I have done the research and found nothing. MRRaja001 (talk) 10:26, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:32, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:32, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: The article makes several unsourced claims, some of which I know to be inaccurate. Appears to be original research and opinion of the article creator. The subject not notable for own article. Fails WP:GNG. Venkat TL (talk) 11:07, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Lack of citations / references. One alternative might be to combine with Shett to create a combined naming related page. Gusfriend (talk) 00:52, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.