Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daisy Taylor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Joyous! | Talk 05:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy Taylor[edit]

Daisy Taylor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENT. Please note that many of the cited sources are NSFW.

  • Refs 1 (Apple Podcasts) and 4 (Podchaser) are podcast interviews.
  • Ref 2 (XXXbios) is a fan page on a sketchy website.
  • Ref 3 (Grooby) is a pornography website.
  • Refs 5 and 7 (IAFD) are database entries.
  • Refs 6 (AVN) and 9 (TEA) are award rosters. The awards don't count towards anything now that PORNBIO has been deprecated.
  • Ref 8 (AVN) is an article in the pornography trade press recapping an award ceremony. This is the only cited source that might count towards the GNG.

The article on the Spanish Wikipedia doesn't include any better references. A WP:BEFORE search turned up press releases and mentions of other people with the same name. Cheers, gnu57 20:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.