Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Da BackWudz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 18:32, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Da BackWudz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this article Da BackWudz has no references, no source for verification, there is no evidence of Notability. therefore the article does not meet Wikipedia Notability Guidelines. Samat lib (talk) 01:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 02:26, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'll see what I can find. I'm fairly certain that their song "I Don't Like The Look Of It" got national rotation (it's how I heard of it), but of course I'll have to find sourcing for this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:16, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The coverage was out there, but you kind of had to finesse Google to really reach it. In any case, their first album received quite a few reviews and it also charted on Billboard 200, so that's enough to pass notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:50, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Tokyogirl79's improvements to the article show that the subject meets WP:BAND and the WP:GNG. — sparklism ^hey! 11:10, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.