Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYSB-AM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:52, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYSB-AM[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't want to repeat myself on this. The Station is clearly a hoax. Scrambling in my mind that GMA Network is not aware of this. The author must be warned again, or need to block him indefinitely. Hamham31 Heke!KushKush! 01:44, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Not notable by itself just because it is owned by a notable media network. Notability is not inherited. Sixth o f March 06:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In theory, per WP:NMEDIA the core notability criteria that a radio station has to meet to be keepable are that it (a) is duly licensed by the appropriate regulatory authority, and (b) produces at least some of its own original programming rather than operating as a pure rebroadcaster or translator of another station. But those criteria do both still have to be verifiable somewhere. We have seen hoax articles created about fantasy radio stations that didn't actually exist at all, so it is not enough to merely claim those things as true — the claim to passing NMEDIA does not actually get the radio station over NMEDIA until it's supported by reliable sources. So I'm willing to revisit this if somebody can locate the proper sourcing necessary to verify that this station satisfies the inclusion criteria, but in this state it's a delete. Bearcat (talk) 16:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.