Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYNU-TV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYNU-TV

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No proof of its notability provided in any way. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 14:01, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:BROADCAST. Also read WP:BEFORE.--RioHondo (talk) 14:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@RioHondo: Is there any reason to consider this station notable enough for its own article other than guidelines you haven't read thoroughly? If it does have original programming, how come the only thing the article contains is information about its location and specs? Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 20:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Raykyogrou0:, as i said WP:BEFORE. You have nominated this article for deletion without even thinking and researching if it offers regional programs that suit its regional viewers of Cebuano speakers when notability for broadcast stations relies on that (and not just what you see in the article's current state).--RioHondo (talk) 02:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you seriously accusing me of not knowing the policy? There aren't even any results to be found when searching the station alone. [1] I mean like, come on. If you have something to present that actually proves notability, go ahead. Otherwise, get busy with something else more useful instead of this pointless argument. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 04:52, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article is titled following some convention. It appears that its common name is UNTV 39 or UNTV Cebu. But as I am not familiar with this channel or anything about the Cebu regional media market for that matter, I would have to wait for the article maker to make the clarification.--RioHondo (talk) 16:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is the channel, this is an article about the station. Not that it matters, there's nothing notable to say about this article. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 14:33, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The subject of the article is a relay station. Per the same guideline given by RioHondo (WP:BROADCAST), relay stations does not merit its own article. 121.54.54.238 (talk) 07:30, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't this station have its own Cebuano language programming like most regional stations? Pinging article starter Supergabbyshoe, appreciate your help on this. Thanks--RioHondo (talk) 11:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 21:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 21:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 21:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per WP:BCAST if it is a relay as stated here, otherwise if it does original programming, then Keep. VMS Mosaic (talk) 08:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect (just like the other station) - I was waiting to see if the relay/original broadcasting issue could be resolved, but since no source has been put forth that it is anything but a relay station, there is no justification to keep. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.