Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYAG-FM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BCAST. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 17:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYAG-FM

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bringing to AfD because of a fraudulently tagged prod (copied from a now-deleted page). However, I would have endorsed this legitimate prod anyway (like I did on the one that was actually copied)—this station does not meet the GNG, and its existence is not verified by an NTC list. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:55, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:55, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:55, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I really have nothing to add but I don't want this to be relisted a bunch of times. This article has been through enough WikiBureaucracy already. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 21:37, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Agree with nom, there is nothing here to indicate notability. It has one low quality reference. Deathlibrarian (talk) 23:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Google search yields no sources. Waddles 🗩 🖉 06:13, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Barely found anything about the unlicensed station. Easily fails WP:BCAST and WP:GNG. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 15:15, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:BCAST per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 01:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above. The only callsign that has a source is DYAG of Negros Occidental and not an aforementioned page above of Cebu, definitely fails WP:BCAST. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 08:51, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.