Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWFritz Automation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DWFritz Automation[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company excluded by both points of WP:N, it both does not meet the sourcing requirements and it is excluded as promotion per WP:NOT. In terms of sourcing, the only coverage that exists is either primary source based in the local business press or it is simply press releases and press release reprints. Both of those are excluded by WP:SPIP and WP:ORGIND from counting towards notability. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:40, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Aside from the references in the article and various routine announcements, there has been a 2013 Portland Business Journal article [1], but that is more about their building than in-depth coverage about the company. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 06:54, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails CoprDepth and GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.