Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DTRules

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DTRules[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. WP:CORPSPAM. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:56, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Much of the article text is about other implementations of similar technology and the remainder mostly about this software's placement in standard repositories. Neither establishes notability for this project and the best that I could see elsewhere was a brief how-to usage guide in a Lulu.com book which I don't see as enough for WP:NSOFT or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 09:34, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.