Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DSKO

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Soft delete as it has been relisted twice with no comment. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:50, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DSKO

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a notable musician. The sources in the article are sites of questionable reliability, YouTube videos or artist profiles, not significant coverage in reliable sources; a search failed to find any more coverage. The "Hype Machine chart" mentioned in the article actually appears to be some kind of blog aggregator thing rather than an actual music chart.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I understand your concern for speedy deletion as you came across a page that is unfinished. This is my first wiki, and as you know I am learning a significant amount along the process. Please give me the opportunity to correct my links and sources as I am sure that they will aid you in understanding the validity of this particular recording artist. Thanks. ~~YoungDingus

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 03:02, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:01, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.