Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DNN (radio)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DNN (radio)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable defunct underlying network for radio Rapido (talk) 14:42, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 18:23, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Once notable, always notable. "Defunct" should never be an argument in an AfD. More to the point, radio and television stations are automatically notable. - Eastmain (talk) 22:17, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Good article and station is notable. This should not have been nominated for deletion. --Cexycy (talk) 10:57, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 03:30, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Earned notability during its existence.--CastAStone /^{/₵₳$↑₳}^{₴₮ʘ№€} 02:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.