Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Profit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draft & userfy until notable; I was actually going to comment until I noticed this has been voluntarily drafted. Feel free to restart the article when notable. (NAC) SwisterTwister talk 06:51, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Profit[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There do not appear to be any reliable sources regarding this DJ's notability. Grahame (talk) 14:32, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 14:35, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability sources have been supplied and cited and requests for more documents to further support notability will be submitted shortly. Clearly other users have issues regarding the page being that it has only been active for less than 48 hours in that period has been flagged multiple times even though further supporting documents, links and cited references have been supplied each edit. These ongoing attempts in regards to questioning DJ Profit's notability. Please Note: This DJ is a very real and notable Australian DJ with a big following in the EDM Australia Scene. I request that this page remains given that it has been targeted for removal clearly since it has been moved from the beginning. However I do advise that further notable sources be added to the page when they become available to further strengthen the pages notability factor. — Preceding Getofftap comment added by Getofftap (talk • contribs) 15:12, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Profit has been an active Australian DJ for several years I created the page in honour of his known achievements that I have sourced myself. The reason it has been flagged from the beginning was my fault I stuffed up some references at first, given that this was my first created page I was excited to make it after one of my favorite EDM dj's. Apart from the pages of his that I have shared there isn't any other media available to my knowledge nor any other digital versions of his events of articles I can track down at the moment I will continue searching for extra notability sources. But I too request that the DJ Profit page stays, I will continue looking for more notable sources as they become available. Thanks. — Preceding Alwayztime87 comment added by Alwayztime87 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 05:30, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Simply not notable. Lacks coverage in reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.