Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Kelblizz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Kelblizz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO and WP:MUSICBIO. Little coverage in reliable secondary sources. The two "biography and net worth" sources are identical and appear to be user-submitted. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:11, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:49, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:50, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:50, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wizkizayo has expressed the following concern in Special:Diff/901746041: "Please these article should not be deleted teahouse help me out here..the article has been improved and won't be edited without proper references" ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:37, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Save the article, Don't delete, other references has been added Wizkizayo (talk) 23:25, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Save - review the references or an admin should re-edit the article instead of delecting.Wizkizayo (talk) 13:55, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Wizkizayo: Repeating your plea isn't going to sway anyone's opinion. You need to show how and why the article should be retained.
You said you've added references, but the sources you've linked to are not reliable. Blogs, press release sites and other self-published sources aren't reliable and can't establish this person's notability.
Also saying that "an admin should re-edit the article" is shifting the responsibility onto others. The burden of evidence is on you, the contributor, to ensure that your content is verifiable from reliable sources. Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources has a list of sources that are considered reliable (and unreliable) for music-related topics.
Finally, Wikipedia does not accept articles on up-and-coming people or things. Someone or something must be already notable to be considered worthy of inclusion. Possible future fame has no effect on present notability. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:04, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Famouspeople18: I changed the • sign you had here to a *. It's for formatting. Also remember that when participating in these types of discussions remember to put your view in bold. (To do this put the text you want bold surrounded with '''. Like this '''bold''') See WP:DISCUSSAFD for more info. Thanks! OkayKenG (talk) 00:04, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.