Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Earworm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. I believe that notability has been sufficiently demonstrated and there are no other delete votes since changes to the article have been made. JBsupreme (talk) 23:15, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Earworm[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Contested prod, limited notability and does not meet WP:BIO guidelines. JBsupreme (talk) 22:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no reliable sources. ~DC _{Talk To Me} 23:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~Leaning toward~~ keep because of this, this, and this, though if someone wants to tell me why they're not reliable I'll hear it out. Glenfarclas (talk) 00:15, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per Glenfarcus. Joe Chill (talk) 00:18, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep DJ Earworm is one of the most recognized mashup artists. Time, The Sun, ABC News establish notability. Gobonobo ^T ^C 03:05, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 03:48, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per Gobonobo as well as plays on Radio 1 in UK and many in the USA I believe. Dotty••|☎ 13:27, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep changing my vote, per the above sources. ~DC _{Talk To Me} 15:42, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.