Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Chef

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. per WP:RELIST (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 06:19, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Chef

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable DJ, All sources are either self published or about a documentary that "featured" him. Ridernyc (talk) 13:26, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I'd like to say keep here as Chef is an important player in the dubstep scene, but the coverage is probably not sufficient for an article. I found these, in case anyone can add any more: XLR8R, New York Magazine (describing him as a 'scene heavyweight'), Radio Srbija.--Michig (talk) 07:01, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. WP:GNG is clearly satisfied (I just added a bit using the XLR8R reference; the Austrian TV interview linked in the article also adds to the notability evidence.) Regards, HaeB (talk) 10:26, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article is about a 21 year old disk jockey. There is not enough independent secondary coverage from reliable sources to justify inclusion. Racepacket (talk) 20:27, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:33, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.