Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DGen (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 15:12, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DGen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Issues of WP:Verifiability and WP:Notability still not addressed. Best I can find is a trivial mention in Retro Gaming Hacks [1]. Previously Kept because.. uh... I'm not sure... it was 2006 and "it's on Google" seemed to be enough back then? Marasmusine (talk) 09:16, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No independent sources whatsoever and while Googling turns up some hits, none are useful, failing WP:GNG. Completely agree with nom about the previous AfD; before the establishment of the notability guidelines, many of the old AfDs were little more than WP:ILIKEIT discussions. Msnicki (talk) 15:29, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I couldn't find any reliable source offering coverage. --Odie5533 (talk) 20:28, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No notability established. Just another program... -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 14:05, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.