Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DGM Services

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 00:21, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DGM Services[edit]

DGM Services (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:39, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete #1 - a newspaper sponsored award where employees vote for their employer (not an RS) #2 dead link #3 dead link #4 individual articles based on #1. A news search gets some routine biz news, all from the Houston area, none that could confer notability. LaMona (talk) 23:47, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 14:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Unfortunately, there are no good sources to suggest this is notable with my searches (News, Books, highbeam and thefreelibrary) only finding this (News). SwisterTwister talk 06:15, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as no evidence of notability - I haven't found anything that's even worth adding so will have to say Delete. –Davey2010Talk 22:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.