Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DGAF (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that it fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 19:17, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DGAF (album)[edit]

Non-notable album by a non-notable group (whose article was deleted via AfD). Fails WP:MUSIC#Albums. Prod removed without comment by article's creator. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 11:13, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 11:17, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The band isn't notable, so their album isn't either. This is yet another reason why I think A7 should extend to include albums. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 11:27, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep My first inclination was to say delete, since this is a first album, and the fact that it's going to be released on Monday gives the impression of a promo; however, the Suburban Noize Records label has had some successes, and we may know within a week whether this is going to become a bullet on a Billboard chart. It's unlikely that we'll have a snowball of opinion either way. Does anyone know whether there was deletion of an article about the band itself? Mandsford (talk) 13:48, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment See nom for link to AfD of the band's article. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 14:01, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the deletion of the band's article. PC78 (talk) 14:12, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TPN's duty-otter. I emphatically agree with the A7 suggestion. There's a similar situation going down with Miniature Tigers - to just name one - and it is all quite tiresome Plutonium27 (talk) 04:41, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Since the band isn't notable, it sorta cascades on down. Jmlk 1 7 20:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As others said, the group isn't even notable and their article has been deleted already. -- Atama ^chat 18:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.