Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DFT Games

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:17, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DFT Games[edit]

DFT Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It doesn't appear that this company has produced any notable games. I suspect the author of the article is the owner of the company. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 18:46, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:20, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Appears not to be notable per the VGRS search. Delete. --Izno (talk) 20:45, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Checked a random selection of games created by this company and none have notoriety Jumpytoo Talk 20:51, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: no independent third-party WP:RS found or given. ww2censor (talk) 22:12, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and other recommendations above. No indication subject meets WP:GNG, WP:WEBCRIT or WP:ORG. (News searches for example return no independent coverage of the company or its works/products). Some trivial mentions and listings for the developer's software - but only insofar as it confirms that the entity exists, and not sufficient to meet notability criteria. Apparent promo issues also of note. Guliolopez (talk) 22:34, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Searching found no sources that would show that this passes WP:COMPANY. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:50, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:SNOW. We are a charity, not an online toy store. Bearian (talk) 02:21, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing++ 11:55, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.