Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DEP International Studios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:35, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DEP International Studios[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 19:00, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Through Google Books can find a few references to the DEP International label, but cannot find there or through Google News UK any reliable source links to the studio. Been here for almost 5 yr with no reliable sources. TransporterMan (TALK) 17:38, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no assertion of notability, nor evidence of it via google. If there's any point retaining the content it could be salvaged into the UB40 article, but it seems not worth it to me. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:25, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:14, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:15, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of evident notability and shortage of reliable sources. Kilopi (talk) 01:28, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 02:27, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.