Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D4Science (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 16:27, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

D4Science

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization with no reliable secondary references. nearlyevil 665 18:14, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. nearlyevil 665 18:14, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

keep: D4Science is an infrastructure whose development has been supported by several EU projects. It is currently serving thousands of users. Moreover, its infrastructure represent a tangible implementation of the Data Infrastructure concept. The Virtual Research Environments it enacts are tangible examples of environments supporting the implementation of Open Science practices. (User:Leonardo.candela)
keep: the article contains 10 references to scientific papers about the article topic. --Leonardo.candela (talk) 19:00, 6 May 2021 (UTC)(User:Leonardo.candela)[reply]

* Speedy delete: CSD G4, had been deleted before CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:26, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It was back in 2016, so I assumed applying G4 was not entirely accurate. nearlyevil 665 18:27, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: the current article is completely new wrt 2016 version. 2016 concern was "Ephemeral project. No independent sources. No indication of notability. Does not meet WP:GNG" (User:Leonardo.candela)

Delete: per nom, no reliable independent coverage found CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:22, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:22, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

keep: The SGCI Science Gateway catalogue https://catalog.sciencegateways.org contains a significant number of entries (not added by the D4Science team). In Google Scholar there are hundred of entries on D4Science https://scholar.google.it/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=D4Science&btnG= In a recent paper discussing the state of art of scientific gateways D4Science is referred https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.6099 --Leonardo.candela (talk) 10:18, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

the European Grid Infrastructure wiki page contains some references to D4Science I made more explicit now. --Leonardo.candela (talk) 17:45, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peachnote, BioISI and D4Science service agreements renewed https://www.egi.eu/news/peachnote-bioisi-and-d4science-service-agreements-renewed/ --Leonardo.candela (talk) 17:40, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

the FAO website contains hundreds of pages referring to D4Science (see http://www.fao.org/home/search/en/?q=d4science) --Leonardo.candela (talk) 17:28, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Anyone else not named leonardo.candela have thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:21, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as several independent sources have been added since nomination. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:57, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Agree with Keep comments above. Meets notability. Webmaster862 (talk) 10:28, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.