Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. Shina (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:09, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

D. Shina[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Subject fails WP:NPROF. The article was once deleted by AFD. Powerful Karma (talk) 06:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)~~ Blocked sock, see here, user was renamed. -- Beccaynr (talk) 15:35, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 06:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 06:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 06:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 06:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 06:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The article is textually very similar to the 2010 deleted version (and was even more similar when it was re-created in 2014) but some of its references are dated later than 2010. Potentially the existence of those references could change the decision from the earlier one, so now that it's started I think we should probably continue the discussion rather than just deleting per G4. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:21, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Perhaps noteworthy that the 2014 creator of this article, Kollameducation, has extensively - almost exclusively - edited in the areas of Sree Narayana Guru establishments and the Indian Electricity sector. Perhaps not. But the subject is not notable as per WP:GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:37, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing available that could be used to argue for WP:Academic. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 10:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG. No indication of notability here. --hroest 19:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt. Her work as a columnist for The Hindu seems more prominent than her academic position, but we still do not have evidence of notability (GNG or otherwise), only her own writings. Given the past history of restoring the article in more or less the same form after a deletion discussion, protecting the title so that it has to go through a full DRV before another restoration seems prudent. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:55, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Fails BIO for BLP. NOthing notable to support keeping this article. Kolma8 (talk) 16:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.