Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D-Link G604T network adaptor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 18:34, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

D-Link G604T network adaptor[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Product is not notable. CanadianOtaku ^{Talk Page} 23:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CanadianOtaku ^{Talk Page} 23:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Existing RS sources immediately show notability. I note a painful signature to my color defectiveness which I suppose is intended to impress closers. I suppose I'm get instructions to turn some option off so I only see black and white. What a choice. Djm-leighpark (talk) 07:36, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I see refs to CNET, which is a RS per WP:RSP, and PC World, which isn't on RSP but I cannot think of why it would be an unreliable soruce. The nomination doesn't really seem to be advancing an argument for deletion. jp×g 23:37, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the page already cites multiple reliable sources and therefore passes WP:GNG. TipsyElephant (talk) 13:23, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The page is having reliable, significant, independent coverages. Sonofstar (talk) 14:59, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.