Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dún Síon (Doonshean)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Whether or not it needs re-renaming is beyond the remit of AfD. The Bushranger One ping only 02:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Dún Síon (Doonshean) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability, no reliable sources, appears promotional in nature. GregJackP Boomer! 23:07, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. 19:19, 16 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Looks like a real village to me. [1] The article was and still is a promotional mess. I've cleaned it up somewhat and moved it to "Doonshean" as that is the English language name (this is English Wikipedia). --Oakshade (talk) 02:49, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser TSU 01:05, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Why on earth have you done a thing like that? It's name is Dún Síon. Even the English-language media refers to it as that. [2] You should change it for Dún Síon. The Doonshean thing looks more like a pronunciation guide for confused Americans, no doubt to stop them pronouncing it Dunce-Eye-On or some other such thing. It's practically original research, whereas there's an actual source for Dún Síon. You might as well have moved it to Dunce-Eye-On when you were at it. Or changed the name of its most famous native to Michael O'Muckerty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.102.241 (talk) 04:39, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – Per Wikipedia's Five pillars, the encyclopedia also functions as a gazetteer, per Wikipedia:Notability (geography) and per WP:MAPOUTCOMES. This is a verified townland. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:32, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per WP:NPLACE, as populated areas are inherently notable. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 19:22, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.