Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Czech Wikipedia (2 nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:56, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Czech Wikipedia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Original research; no third-party refs. Nothing improved for 2 years since the first nomination. - Altenmann >t 00:48, 12 December 2009 (UTC)~~ [reply]

Nomination withdrawn after finally someone got some respect to do a descent page. - Altenmann >t 21:53, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The irony is stunning. OutlawSpark (talk) 01:12, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indifference is stunninng. - Altenmann >t 21:53, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I am not in favor of merging every article about every different language wikipedia into one article. because i think wikipedia itself is notable and should have a page on wikipedia, and subpage organization makes sense.--Milowent (talk) 03:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per Milowent. Joe Chill (talk) 14:17, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not every website is notable: claiming that a specific language's edition of Wikipedia is notable because Wikipedia is notable is effectively a claim that the edition is inheriting notability from Wikipedia in general. Nyttend (talk) 18:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just added 3 references and see there are more that could be added. This wikipedia is covered in almost 30 other language wikipedias. This AfD is absurd.--Milowent (talk) 20:23, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where have you been before? Do we have to put on afd every unreferenced article until someone skilled in czech language bothers to add refs? - Altenmann >t 21:53, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

haha. that's a good question. i realize your nomination was in good faith, but i am not actually skilled in czech language, just used google translate and some tricks i have picked up. one of which is that wikipedia is spelled slightly differently in czech. i think the english wikipedia is far more into the "improve" stage of seeking references as compared to other wikipedias.--Milowent (talk) 00:04, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. We do seem to have an article on all the major-language Wikipedias (and some minor-language ones). See Category:Wikipedias by language. No reason to exclude the Czech Wikipedia. Yes, I know, "other stuff exists", but the precedent seems to have been established. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 22:45, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.Bobble hobble dobble (talk) 22:58, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.