Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cycloc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nrk666 -- RoySmith (talk) 00:34, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cycloc

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spam article creates by a paid editor in violation of the TOU. I blocked the editor yesterday, and today a Lazarus account (last edit in 2008) came alive to remove the PROD tag. Not notable and native advertising, so we delete it. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Every morning (there's a halo...) 15:50, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Every morning (there's a halo...) 15:50, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable. Acnetj (talk) 18:50, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Post-declarations are not a get out of jail free card, and enough of us have been round the block enough times to recognise a blatant exploitation for money of our voluntary work when we see it. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:08, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.