Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyber Security rogue anti-spyware

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The policy based arguments here show a consensus to delete. I am not convinced anough of the suggested merge target to redirect, but will provide the content on request. Kevin (talk) 21:42, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cyber Security rogue anti-spyware

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable software that is not mentioned at all in the reference provided. Article contains long lists of registry keys and files that software creates, which does not belong in an encyclopedia. Possible COI, as user has only created articles on the subject of malware that use the same website as a source. Netalarmtalk 21:32, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find any reliable sources that discuss this. There is nothing to establish notability. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 21:41, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Jujutacular ^T · C 21:43, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 21:58, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Google for "Cyber Security" and "virus", and you can read all about it. Plenty of coverage in reliable sources about it. The article perhaps needs a better name. Dream Focus 22:37, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to MS Antivirus (malware). It appears to be a clone of this software. --HamburgerRadio (talk) 01:54, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 05:24, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.