Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cut City

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Favonian (talk) 12:09, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cut City

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete fails WP:BAND. Lack of notability established through significant coverage through reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Indie Swedish rock band that released a couple of albums on local independent labels. Did not chart; no hits. No references provided outside of social networking sites (FB and MS). Ran a search for references and was not able to find any that were not self-published or independent of the subject. Also nominating two albums, Cut City (EP) and Exit Decades, due to lack of notability. Did not chart; no hits. (No idea why this is categorized as Games and Sports. Twinkle is being weird.) Cindamuse (talk) 09:35, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 1). Fixed now. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 19:39, 18 September 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Delete as Cut City fails notability criteria for bands and the other two fail notability criteria for albums. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 20:24, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
DONT DELETE as Cut City is a current swedish rock band, just because there albums havent charted doesnt mean they dont need a wikipedia page, whats the point of wikipedia if you can't add to it with established signed acts. I have found references from the Deleted Art label which are not self published and are from the label itself. further more, Cut City are mentioned on the page for Interpol's third album, which does show that Cut City are being mentioned at a reputable source.—Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterJ89 (talk • contribs)

See: WP:MERCY and just because this band exists, it does not mean they should have an article on Wikipedia. if they can pass Wikipedias notability criteria for inclusion. This is not reliable and the other two are not independet from the band. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 00:21, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above; this band fails our WP:BAND criteria—Chris!_c/t 21:31, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
DO NOT DELETE. What's the point of the wiki, if not providing information? Why should you delete this entry, just because it doesn't match your criteria, maybe you should rewrite your BAND criteria. Without this wikipedia article, people's knowledge of this band would be even smaller, this being an independient band. I got to know this great band just because it was listed under "Swedish rock bands" or a similar article. You shouldn't delete it. --Fedeg13 (talk) 22:07, 20 September 2010 (UTC) — Fedeg13 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.[reply]
Delete all, evidence of meeting WP:BAND does not appear to be demonstrated. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:43, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.