Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curtis Smith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 21:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Curtis Smith

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:BIO. All the sources seem to come from his own company, from trade directories & promotional interviews. Bazj (talk) 10:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Bazj (talk) 10:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bazj (talk) 10:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep His business position is notable enough, and not all the sources come from his own company. SuperCarnivore591 (talk) 01:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC) Changing to delete, not seeing any good improvement. SuperCarnivore591 (talk) 19:10, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What "business position" are you referring to? Kraxler (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:PROMO curriculum, spiked with name-dropping, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED Kraxler (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I'm not seeing any improvement and my searches found nothing good. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nothing on the search engines shows notability. As Kraxler said, notability is not inherited. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:35, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of independent coverage, and lack of significant coverage. Fails WP:BLPNOTE. --Bejnar (talk) 21:33, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.