Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curtin University of Technology Student Guild
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Curtin_University#Student_Guild. There is a clear consensus, that a separate article isn't warranted. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Curtin University of Technology Student Guild[edit]
- Curtin University of Technology Student Guild (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While this student association exists, I cannot find sufficient RS coverage to suggest that it is notable by wp standards, to the extent that it should have a stand-alone article. Zero refs. Tagged for that defect for over 4 years. Tagged for notability for over 3 years. Created by an SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 10:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This topic is as well covered under Curtin_University#Student_Guild so no need for this separate and unreferenced article. AllyD (talk) 12:50, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 00:00, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per AllyD. WWGB (talk) 00:13, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Easily sourceable with WP:RS should someone put in the time, brief section in university article not appropriate to cover detail. Rebecca (talk) 04:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- see WP:MUSTBESOURCES, please provide these sources. under WP:BURDEN, anyone can challenge unsourced info. LibStar (talk) 06:17, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:ORG. nothing in gnews, 1 article in major Australian news site [1]. hardly significant coverage. LibStar (talk) 06:33, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.