Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cups 'n Strings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 00:14, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cups 'n Strings[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was unable to establish notability per WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 02:02, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm finding quite a lot of coverage actually such as here FloridaArmy (talk) 10:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. The link above is a republished press release about a routine corporate appointment. I'm not seeing WP:SIGCOV here. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:02, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Having difficulty finding notable coverage of the page in question.BrxBrx(talk)^{(please reply with { {re|BrxBrx}})} 17:52, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix (talk) 21:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Ivecos (t) 19:05, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.