Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CupOfTeam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted A7 and G11 by Admin DGG. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 12:13, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CupOfTeam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete — Subject does not meet notability criteria; in particular WP:ENT (note that YouTube cannot be used to verify claims of notability). — Fly by Night (talk) 21:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:17, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:17, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:17, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as non-notable person/web-content. YouTube users are not notable just based on the number of hits they have on a video. They need to meet the WP:GNG, which this group does not do. None of the sources are reliable (except for the BBC, which has no mention of them). ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 21:42, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.