Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cumberland Land Conservancy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cumberland Land Conservancy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Aside from the usual social media pages, there is no significant coverage of the organization in reliable secondary sources. There is a Daily Telegraph article which mentions the organization, but it appears to be a trivial mention. Biblioworm 02:23, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Kharkiv07 ^Talk 02:31, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete clearly fails WP:ORG. Amateur org with no significant coverage. LibStar (talk) 15:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above arguments. Longevitydude (talk) 00:52, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.