Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural Developments under the Delhi Sultanate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:38, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural Developments under the Delhi Sultanate[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero refs. Appears to be OR. Perhaps a school paper. If there were anything RS-supported in it, it might be worthy of merger. But there isn't. Epeefleche (talk) 22:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Appears to be full of OR. The Islamic cultural developments in India were not restricted to the Sultanate alone. Not much significance with regard to the Sultanate either. X.One ^SOS 04:54, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As said above, this is just an OR essay. - Sitush (talk) 17:07, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources, no citations. (Not much of a school paper at that.) 67.239.100.244 (talk) 17:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's funny.--Epeefleche (talk) 17:05, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.