Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural Beira (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The only two delete !votes give "hoax" as rationale which it certainly is not. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 14:49, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural Beira[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As others have mentioned, there's no good evidence and the current source actually never mentions this club. As also noted, the author made other questionable and unsourced edits including another I have nominated for AfD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Espoir Tsevie. SwisterTwister talk 21:05, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence this club exists, likely hoax. Giant Snowman 09:49, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:25, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Not hoax, see this new site I found called RSSSF which, when coupled with this new fangled thing called Google shows in about five seconds that they have played in the top flight of Mozambiquan football as seen here. Meets current consensus for notability for clubs per WP:FOOTYN as they have played in a national competition (and at the highest level). The fact that this initial source is for 1980 is irrelevant per WP:NTEMP. Fenix down (talk) 14:15, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per good work by Fenix down and this .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.