Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cult radio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This article is not only unsourced, it is unverifiable - it can not be sourced because there are no sources to corroborate the statements. Quite simply, it is comprised solely of original research and is therefore unsuitable for inclusion. Picaroon (Talk) 21:17, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cult radio[edit]

Delete - unsourced indiscriminate list full of POV and OR. Otto4711 16:25, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm going to agree with you on this. Basically just a short paragrah, and a list of supposed cult radio programs. Looks like total Original Research to me. --sumnjim ^{talk with me·changes} 16:30, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would say redirect somewhere, but I'm not sure where. Cult fiction won't work since radio isn't always fiction. This applies to Cult television as well. So delete, and hopefully find a place to redirect it, or rewrite from sources. FrozenPurpleCube 00:28, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't show any discernible way to limit entries and has no sources. It is very difficult to label cult items (including films, books, and radio shows), so perhaps it is best not to have a page on this subject. --Nehrams2020 07:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Is something having cult status hard to define? Yes. Does that mean we shouldn't have an article on it? No. Tag it with source requests where appropriate and move on. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 00:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Brevity is not a problem. The list needs work but seems a good start. Tests for inclusion might include the existence of a fan club and media references to the show as a cult. Colonel Warden 21:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to cult following, the concept probably exists, it just doesn't need its own page. Axem Titanium 03:58, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.