Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cubis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 19:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cubis[edit]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

per WP:NFT Koppas (talk) 19:08, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with haste per WP:WHYCANTMADEUPCRAPLIKETHISBESPEEDIED. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 19:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it could even be speedied as a hoax. WP:MADEUP. Drawn Some (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Cubis is not a hoax. http://games.yahoo.com/console/cubis2 But I admit the online shockwave version sucks, the downloadable executive was far better. NVO (talk) 20:30, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess a 404 page is sufficient evidence, changing my opinion to Delete. Drawn Some (talk) 21:04, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The link worked when I clicked on it. "Cubis" is a real online game. There is no reason to delete this - you're wasting your precious time worrying about an amusing and harmless page. BenE 11:25, 15 May 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.156.131.8 (talk) — 217.156.131.8 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Yes, there is an on-line game, but this article is not about that, it's about something quite different made up one day by Messrs Murtagh and Harris. Also, see WP:NOHARM. JohnCD (talk) 10:53, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:N and WP:NFT. Agree with TPH. JohnCD (talk) 19:48, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a non-notable game. I would say it's borderline speedyable as no context, as the only thing the article actually states about the subject is that it's an office game, but it's probably too long for that, so I'll stick with delete. Rnb (talk) 20:11, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete I'm not sure where Rnb has been but Cubis is actually pretty well known and rather notable - the page is of course still in its infancy so I think it should be given time to expand and educate others on its viability le_derriere 11:45, 15 May 2009— le_derreire (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

If it is notable that needs to be verifiable by "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Other supporters: before you comment, please read the content guideline you will find by clicking on Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. JohnCD (talk) 11:08, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wikipedia is not for bored office workers to make stuff up. Fences and windows (talk) 00:15, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete, this game is present in my office in Horsham, West Sussex. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.212.70.122 (talk) 15:51, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.