Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cub Lo-Boy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Farmall Cub. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:12, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cub Lo-Boy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient information and notability to have a fully separate page from Farmall Cub (i.e. topic is sufficiently covered already). Primefac (talk) 21:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect May as well redirect it to Farmall Cub. clpo13_(talk) 06:39, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Clpo13. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 13:39, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment technically my vote is for redirect, but since it was recently created and has what appears to be two SPAs working on it, I figured consensus would be better than an edit war in case delete was the final option. Primefac (talk) 14:11, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as there's obviously not much for a separate article. SwisterTwister talk 04:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.