Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crush (Pendulum song)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:04, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Crush (Pendulum song)[edit]
- Crush (Pendulum song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A single that is not due to be released in two months with the only source saying it will be a single. Clearly fails notability requirements of WP:NSONGS (no charts, awards, covers, etc.). Redirects to the album article have be reverted. No prejudice against recreation when song charts or otherwise establishes notability. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 15:55, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It has been confirmed to be released. Information will be added to the article as and when it is made available. Every article is built upon as information is available. And alot of articles are about advance releases from notable artists. Alinblack (talk) 17:27, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Totally agree, shouldn't be deleted. As the band (or at least it's lead singer) stated in an earlier interview that i'll try and find, this was going to be the first single, they wouldn't just change their minds and not release it. I'll put more info on the actual song87.114.35.194 (talk) 11:17, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It has been confirmed to be released. Information will be added to the article as and when it is made available. Every article is built upon as information is available. And alot of articles are about advance releases from notable artists. Alinblack (talk) 17:27, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NSONGS and WP:CRYSTAL.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 18:42, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Delete per WP:NSONGS and WP:CRYSTAL.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 18:42, 15 October 2010 (UTC)" Rubbish coming from an anonymous IP address. There is nothing on the article that is speculative. Alinblack (talk) 01:00, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Please be civil. Did you bother reading WP:NSONGS? The song has yet to be released thus it hasn't even charted, and consequently it doesn't deserve an article at the moment. And the point of WP:CRYSTAL is not merely verifiability but notability of future events.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 13:55, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.