Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crunk energy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Crunk!!!. No Guru 19:52, 15 June 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Crunk energy[edit]

This article is an advertisement for the product. V. Joe 20:35, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable product (16k Google hits, endorsed by hip hop celebrity). I cleaned up the adspeak. OhNo itsJamie ^Talk 21:20, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy redirect. OhNo itsJamie ^Talk 00:17, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

*Merge to Lil Jon. The drinks only notability ( from online newspaper articles ) is it's link to him. Without the link it's just another non-notable energy drink. Delete if no merge - Peripitus (Talk) 22:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy redirect per Youngamerican - Peripitus (Talk) 09:04, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy redirect to Crunk!!!, an ~~much better, well-established~~ article on the same product with a more-accurate name. youngamerican (talk) 23:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I just checked out the redirect target, and the version before I trimmed it down wasnt THAT much better, but it is the correct title and has a neat info box. That being said, I still say speedy redirect. youngamerican (talk) 00:37, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy redirect per youngamerican. GassyGuy 00:28, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy redirect per youngamerican. --Starionwolf 23:09, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.