Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crunk'd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Ged UK 15:50, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crunk'd[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this album All that is in the article is an infobox and a track list. Joe Chill (talk) 02:36, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:00, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can not find "significant independent coverage" which is needed to meet WP:NALBUMS. Gongshow ^Talk 03:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:35, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete No indications (or even claims) of notability, no sources, almost no info at all in the article. TJ Spyke 02:36, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged for speedy delete as artist isn't on wikipedia. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 06:42, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.