Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crunge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:28, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Crunge[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolute nonsense supposed neologism. Old word reworked for puffery. Mentioned by Led Zep. Old Scottish word. scope_creep (talk) 00:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. bd2412 T 02:44, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not much else to add other than what is above. Ceronomus (talk) 05:12, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per WP:NEO. Also, since The Crunge is a thing that exists, the onus is largely on the author to make the case here, that is, unless someone is willing to sort through a few hundred sources much/most of which are likely about Led Zeppelin. As it happens, the article itself is very nearly the best argument against notability that can probably be made. TimothyJosephWood 14:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.