Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cruisin' Susan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:12, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cruisin' Susan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim of notability. No independent sources. Routine service record of an aircraft. MB 06:02, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:11, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:11, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BASIC. Mztourist (talk) 14:30, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree and a quick search isn't finding more sources. Also many of the items in Category:Individual aircraft of World War II are of doubtful notability. (t · c) buidhe 08:09, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Any aircraft that participated in a major war is inherently noteworthy from a historical standpoint, and for the sake of capturing the historical details of the war that could be forgotten or glossed over unless documented. Zacharyfruhling (talk) 13:48, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no policy that supports this assertion. Mztourist (talk) 17:12, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:BASIC. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of notable topics and not a blog for in-depth historical minutia that is not covered by reliable sources. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:09, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -I see no claim to notability in the article - what is supposed to mark this aircraft out over any other? GraemeLeggett (talk) 08:21, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing particularly noteworthy about the aircraft that makes it stand out among the tens of thousands of wartime crashes. Although "successful crash landing" was an amusing description in the article. MilborneOne (talk) 11:52, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.