Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crownie (cookie + brownie)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 19:42, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Crownie (cookie + brownie)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While undoubtedly tasty, also non-notable. Contested proposed deletion. Neutrality^talk 05:27, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm unfortunately favoring the delete option, because there is no establishment of notability. Also, does this treat concoction have significant notable coverage? Backtable ^{Speak to me}_{concerning my deeds.} 06:01, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 06:33, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - see discussion at WP:Food and drink. --Slashme (talk) 06:59, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Backtable. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 08:12, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.