Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crown Group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 18:00, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crown Group[edit]

Crown Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:CORP Mdann52 (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not finding significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Some minor trade publication mentions[1], but doesn't meet notability threshold. Note that there are a few other companies also named 'Crown Group' that may be notable[2]. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 12:45, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:45, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as this has existed since November 2005 and I found nothing to suggest meaningful better improvement. Pinging past users JzG and MONGO. SwisterTwister talk 06:49, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.