Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crown Canyon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Crown Canyon[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article as written violates WP:NOTPROMO. Sources are not reliable, many not independent. I see some 2015 coverage of a similarly named place in Arizona, but based on this content, it does not seem to be about this community. —siro χ o 09:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:PROMO. SportingFlyer T·C 09:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:45, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Some references are problematic, including Forbes (a contributor article) and AZ Big Media. Of the remaining references, https://www.arizonafoothillsmagazine.com/in-house/in-house-news/retsy-bedbrock-partner-for-new-paradise-valley-crown-canyon-community and https://www.citysuntimes.com/real_estate/bedbrock-retsy-partner-to-co-list-luxury-crown-canyon-community/article_c4dc5cc6-9688-11ed-aee2-03d2d6968c30.html both seem legitimate. I also found this one, from a television station: https://www.12news.com/article/life/home-garden/huge-houses/30-million-laying-around-afford-paradise-valley-mansion/75-06794489-4189-4dc1-a429-233bf8e45307 Eastmain (talk • contribs) 12:19, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Foothills magazine appears to be a press release. Still not seeing it. It's just a housing development. SportingFlyer T·C 16:20, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep/Improve a Google search comes up with articles, mostly about how expensive the houses are in this community. I found some articles 1, 2. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisJem (talk • contribs) 18:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Including further discussion on the known sources
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 12:03, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Eastmain. For a topic to be notable, we just need two in-depth sources to establish the notability and here we have more than two sources: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Passes WP:SIGCOV. 129.222.136.103 (talk) 19:17, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd like to see some additional assessment on newly found sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:34, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - While some references don't indicate passing WP:NOTE, that doesn't negate that others as Eastmain has pointed out do. Oakshade (talk) 20:13, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.