The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WjBscribe 23:57, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Unsourced. Links do not use the term. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 18:13, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It strikes me as original research. YechielMan 15:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
