Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crotchduster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 13:20, Feb. 2, 2006

Crotchduster[edit]

Was tagged for nn-band, but they are on allmusic so I don't think that applies. That said, despite the allmusic listing, I don't think they are actually notable - but what do I know? Bringing it here instead. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 12:09, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment In order to be speedied, it is not necessary for the subject to be proven "non-notable". All that is necessary is an absence of any assertion of notability. Such as this case. jmd 22:43, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete. Plenty of Google hits; you can buy their album from Amazon.com; record label seems legit enough. The fact that their drummer is a dog is a bit off-putting, but it is a parody band. I was going to vote Keep but after reading WP:Music], unless one of their songs or their album has charted, they're not notable until their second album gets published. Still, they seem fairly well-known considering. I would say merge with Capharnaum (band) if that article ever gets created -- maybe together they're notable enough. Powers 15:25, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, released an album on legit record label. Kappa 17:30, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Zzzzz 19:12, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Blnguyen 07:23, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.