Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cross Wiber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:11, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cross Wiber[edit]

(Find video game sources: "Cross Wiber" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Two line stub Coin945 (talk) 01:09, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 December 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:33, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 02:38, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As the game is extremely old, I doubt we will get any reliable secondary sources in the internet. BTW, this game has a prequel, Cyber Cross which is also a 2 line stub without any sources given. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 10:14, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete absolutely no sourcing at all. It is long past time we stopped tolerating unsourced articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:03, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a non-notable video game failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 14:01, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.